This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
resource_sharing [2022/01/16 11:24] 81.155.150.187 |
resource_sharing [2023/09/18 09:18] (current) admin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A new **Resource Sharing** landscape is emerging with several providers offering new resource sharing solutions | A new **Resource Sharing** landscape is emerging with several providers offering new resource sharing solutions | ||
+ | ===== NEWS ===== | ||
- | The key developments in a new resource sharing landscape are described below. | + | [[https://openlibraryfoundation.org/newsroom/news/introducing-the-open-resource-sharing-coalition-openrs/|The Open Resource Sharing Coalition (OpenRS)]] a resource sharing initiative created in partnership with library consortia, open source developers, and vendors. OpenRS is a heterogeneous resource sharing system that is ILS and Discovery agnostic and accommodates the full spectrum of mediated and unmediated resource sharing.\\ |
+ | The key developments in a new resource sharing landscape are described below. See also | ||
+ | |||
+ | **[[https://www.kenchadconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/New_approaches_to_resource_sharing-_Dec2022-1.pdf|New approaches to resource sharing: transforming library collections and the user experience.**]]** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ken Chad. Higher Education Library Technology [HELibTech] **Briefing Pape**r No. 8, December 2022. | ||
+ | |||
+ | InterLibrary loan (ILL) is an essential library service. Even the largest, most well-funded library cannot meet, from its own collections, all the resource needs of all its users. However, InterLibrary loan (ILL) and document delivery (DD) workflows and software solutions can be complex with staff intensive workflows. A new generation of library resource sharing solutions is helping libraries transform legacy ILL practices and systems and challenge past assumptions. In the past, key factors limiting efficient ILL/DD were the complex nature and poor interoperability of ILL systems and the resultant staff intensive workflows and costs. As we move into the second quarter of the 21st century, technology has transformed ILL/resource sharing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **[[https://uksg.underline.io/lecture/83246-new-approaches-to-resource-sharing-reassessing-library-collections-resetting-the-power-balance-in-support-of-the-open-research-agenda|New approaches to resource sharing - a reassessment of library collections and a more open research agenda**]]**\\ | ||
+ | Ken Chad and Anna Clements. **Video **of the presentation at the UKSG Annual Conference. 14 April 2023. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A new generation of library resource sharing solutions is helping libraries transform legacy ILL practices and systems. Solutions such as Project Reshare, RapidILL from Ex Libris and Tipasa from OCLC are helping to build peer-to-peer resource sharing communities such as the N8+, improve the user experience and reduce costs and complexity. They are also challenging assumptions about library collections and the value of big deals, helping to drive forward a more open and equitable research environment. | ||
===== ISO ILL compliant LMSs ===== | ===== ISO ILL compliant LMSs ===== | ||
- | For many years, ILDS functionality was either not included in library management systems (LMSs) or, in the UK, focussed on placing requests with the British Library's document supply service (BLDSS) rather than managing peer-to-peer ILDS. This has changed in the last few years with LMS suppliers, such as SirsiDynix, OCLC and PTFS-Europe (Koha) adopting the ISO ILL 10160/10161 standard. However the adoption of the ISO protocol for practical peer-to-peer resource sharing in the UK is limited. | + | For many years, ILDS functionality was either not included in library management systems (LMSs) or, in the UK, focussed on placing requests with the British Library's document supply service (BLDSS) rather than managing peer-to-peer ILDS. This has changed in the last few years with LMS suppliers, such as SirsiDynix, OCLC and PTFS-Europe (Koha) adopting the [[https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/iso/ill/standard.htm|ISO ILL 10160/10161]] standard. However the adoption of the ISO protocol for practical peer-to-peer resource sharing in the UK is limited. |
- | The only example application In December 2021) is in Wales, where a consortium of eight higher education libraries (all part of WHELF) with the Ex Libris Alma LMS use the ISO standard to enable both digital and physical sharing and ensure an equitable spread of requests across participating institutions. There are future plans to extend this to the NHS libraries in Wales (which also use Alma). It should be noted that the resource sharing participants all use the same (Alma) LMS and, for practical implementation reasons, the WHELF invitation to extend the network is currently only open to other Alma customers. | + | The only example application In December 2021) is in Wales, where [[https://whelf.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/WHELFs-P2P-Alma-Inter-Lending-Scheme-v2.pdf|a consortium of eight higher education libraries]] (all part of WHELF) with the Ex Libris Alma LMS use the ISO standard to enable both digital and physical sharing and ensure an equitable spread of requests across participating institutions. There are future plans to extend this to the NHS libraries in Wales (which also use Alma). It should be noted that the resource sharing participants all use the same (Alma) LMS and, for practical implementation reasons, the WHELF invitation to extend the network is currently only open to other Alma customers. |
===== Rapid ILL ===== | ===== Rapid ILL ===== |