User Tools

Site Tools


discovery

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
discovery [2018/10/10 10:14]
86.147.100.222
discovery [2019/07/18 13:10]
81.156.231.110
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 **Discovery** **Discovery**
 +=====   ​Overviews and reports ​  =====
  
 2018 Report: **[[http://​renewpublishingconsultants.com/​wp-content/​uploads/​2018/​08/​How-Readers-Discover-Content-2018-Published-180903.pdf|How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications**]]** 2018 Report: **[[http://​renewpublishingconsultants.com/​wp-content/​uploads/​2018/​08/​How-Readers-Discover-Content-2018-Published-180903.pdf|How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications**]]**
Line 30: Line 31:
  
   * [[:​discovery_tool_aquabrowser|AquaBrowser]] (ProQuest -Serials Solutions)   * [[:​discovery_tool_aquabrowser|AquaBrowser]] (ProQuest -Serials Solutions)
- 
   * [[:​discovery_tool_blacklight|Blacklight ]](open source-The University of Virginia Library and Stanford University Library are the primary development partners)   * [[:​discovery_tool_blacklight|Blacklight ]](open source-The University of Virginia Library and Stanford University Library are the primary development partners)
- +  ​* [[:​discovery_tool_ebsco_discovery|Ebsco Discovery Service]] (EBSCO) 
-  ​* [[:​discovery_tool_ebsco_discovery|Ebsco Discovery Service]](EBSCO) +  * [[:​discovery_tool_encore|Encore]] (Innovative Interfaces)
- +
-  * [[:​discovery_tool_encore|Encore]](Innovative Interfaces) +
- +
-  * [[:​discovery_tool_endeca|Endeca]](Oracle) +
   * [[:​discovery_tool_explorit|Explorit]] (Deep Web Technologies )   * [[:​discovery_tool_explorit|Explorit]] (Deep Web Technologies )
- 
   * [[:​discovery_tool_fast|FAST]](Microsoft)   * [[:​discovery_tool_fast|FAST]](Microsoft)
- 
   * [[http://​scholar.google.co.uk/​intl/​en/​scholar/​about.html|Google Scholar]](Google)   * [[http://​scholar.google.co.uk/​intl/​en/​scholar/​about.html|Google Scholar]](Google)
 +  * [[https://​www.leanlibrary.com/​|Lean Library]] (Sage Publications)
   * [[:​discovery_tool_primo|Primo]] (Ex Libris)   * [[:​discovery_tool_primo|Primo]] (Ex Libris)
- 
   * [[http://​capitadiscovery.co.uk|Prism]] (Capita)   * [[http://​capitadiscovery.co.uk|Prism]] (Capita)
- 
-  * [[:​discovery_tool_seesearch|Seesearch (Vizolve)]] 
- 
   * [[:​discovery_tool_summon|Summon]] (Pro Quest/​ExLibris)   * [[:​discovery_tool_summon|Summon]] (Pro Quest/​ExLibris)
- 
   * [[:​discovery_tool_vufind|VuFind]] (open source - developed & maintained by Villanova University in the USA)   * [[:​discovery_tool_vufind|VuFind]] (open source - developed & maintained by Villanova University in the USA)
- +  ​* [[:​discovery_tool_worldcat|WorldCat ]](OCLC)
-  ​* [[:​discovery_tool_worldcat|WorldCat ​Local]] (OCLC) +
   * [[:​discovery_tool_xc|XC]] (Open Source - Rochester Uni)   * [[:​discovery_tool_xc|XC]] (Open Source - Rochester Uni)
 +  * [[:​yewno|Yewno]]
  
 ==== Discovery products reviews ==== ==== Discovery products reviews ====
Line 71: Line 58:
 Selecting a web-scale discovery service is a large and important undertaking that involves a significant investment of time, staff, and resources. Finding the right match begins with a thorough and carefully planned evaluation process. In order to be successful, this process should be inclusive, goal-oriented,​ data-driven,​ user-centered,​ and transparent. The following article offers a step-by-step guide for developing a web-scale discovery evaluation plan rooted in these five key principles based on best practices synthesized from the literature as well as the author’s own experiences coordinating the evaluation process at Rutgers University. The goal is to offer academic libraries that are considering acquiring a web-scale discovery service a blueprint for planning a structured and comprehensive evaluation process. \\ Selecting a web-scale discovery service is a large and important undertaking that involves a significant investment of time, staff, and resources. Finding the right match begins with a thorough and carefully planned evaluation process. In order to be successful, this process should be inclusive, goal-oriented,​ data-driven,​ user-centered,​ and transparent. The following article offers a step-by-step guide for developing a web-scale discovery evaluation plan rooted in these five key principles based on best practices synthesized from the literature as well as the author’s own experiences coordinating the evaluation process at Rutgers University. The goal is to offer academic libraries that are considering acquiring a web-scale discovery service a blueprint for planning a structured and comprehensive evaluation process. \\
  \\  \\
-**[[https://​www.tsl.texas.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​public/​tslac/​lot/​TSLAC_WP_discovery_2ed_final_20150826.pdf|Discovery services White paper]].**Texas State Library & Archives Commission (Revised edition August 2015) \\ "This paper attempts to provide an overview of discovery services, including their advantages, disadvantages,​ limitations and best practices. In addition, a synopsis of the major discovery vendors is provided in Appendix A" \\  \\ **[[http://​www.niso.org/​apps/​group_public/​download.php/​14487/​future_library_resource_discovery.pdf|The Future of Library Resource Discovery]]:​**A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee \\ By Marshall Breeding February 2015 \\ "This paper provides an overview of the current resource discovery environment and discusses some of the possibilities regarding how these technologies,​ methodologies,​ and products might be able to adapt to changes in the evolving information landscape in scholarly communications and to take advantage of new technologies,​ metadata models, or linking environments to better accomplish the needs of libraries to provide access to resources"​. \\  \\ **[[http://​www.cilip.org.uk/​sites/​default/​files/​documents/​Catalogue%20and%20Index%20issue%20170,​%20March%202013.pdf|Discovery layers and discovery services: a review]]** ​ \\ Andrew Christison, LIS Systems Manager, Sheffield Hallam University \\ IN - Catalogue and Index.Periodical of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) Cataloguing and Indexing Group \\ March 2013, Issue 170 \\  \\ "​Blacklight:​ a next-generation discovery interface"​. By Chris Awre, Head of Information Management, & Diane Leeson, Content and Access Team Leader, Information Management, Library and Learning Innovation, University of Hull \\ IN - [[http://​www.cilip.org.uk/​sites/​default/​files/​documents/​Catalogue%20and%20Index%20issue%20170,​%20March%202013.pdf|Catalogue and Index]].Periodical of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) Cataloguing and Indexing Group \\+**[[https://​www.tsl.texas.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​public/​tslac/​lot/​TSLAC_WP_discovery_2ed_final_20150826.pdf|Discovery services White paper]].**Texas State Library & Archives Commission (Revised edition August 2015) \\ "This paper attempts to provide an overview of discovery services, including their advantages, disadvantages,​ limitations and best practices. In addition, a synopsis of the major discovery vendors is provided in Appendix A" \\  \\ **[[http://​www.niso.org/​apps/​group_public/​download.php/​14487/​future_library_resource_discovery.pdf|The Future of Library Resource Discovery]]:​**A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee \\ By Marshall Breeding February 2015 \\ "This paper provides an overview of the current resource discovery environment and discusses some of the possibilities regarding how these technologies,​ methodologies,​ and products might be able to adapt to changes in the evolving information landscape in scholarly communications and to take advantage of new technologies,​ metadata models, or linking environments to better accomplish the needs of libraries to provide access to resources"​. \\  \\ **[[http://​www.cilip.org.uk/​sites/​default/​files/​documents/​Catalogue%20and%20Index%20issue%20170,​%20March%202013.pdf|Discovery layers and discovery services: a review]]** \\ Andrew Christison, LIS Systems Manager, Sheffield Hallam University \\ IN - Catalogue and Index.Periodical of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) Cataloguing and Indexing Group \\ March 2013, Issue 170 \\  \\ "​Blacklight:​ a next-generation discovery interface"​. By Chris Awre, Head of Information Management, & Diane Leeson, Content and Access Team Leader, Information Management, Library and Learning Innovation, University of Hull \\ IN - [[http://​www.cilip.org.uk/​sites/​default/​files/​documents/​Catalogue%20and%20Index%20issue%20170,​%20March%202013.pdf|Catalogue and Index]].Periodical of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) Cataloguing and Indexing Group \\
 March 2013, Issue 170 \\ March 2013, Issue 170 \\
  \\  \\
discovery.txt · Last modified: 2019/08/30 08:12 by 86.181.70.180